Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s wife, Ho Ching, has sparked criticism online for her recent comments on the monetary incentive the Singapore government paid pop star Taylor Swift for making the country her only Southeast Asian tour stop.
Mdm Ho had downplayed the incentive, estimated to be between $2-4 million, as a “thank you honorarium” or a deal “sweetener” instead of a sum that had the power to make or break her decision to perform here.
She argued in a lengthy Facebook post, this week that the payment was likely seen as a token of appreciation rather than a decisive factor in finalising the deal. The former Temasek chief said:
“It sounded more like a thank you honorarium to celebrate her decision to come to Sg. But being the good civil servants, STB must have cracked their heads to find an internal rationale for giving the “grant”.”
“They can’t call it a welcome gift for a daughter or granddaughter of 2 well established Sg resident from early years. They also cannot call it a thank you gift, as that would set a bad precedent for the future. It is also not a donation in exchange for providing lowest price tickets at S$88/- each.
“And so in the typical civil service speak, it can only be a grant.”
Claiming that the reported payment to Swift represented a relatively small percentage of total revenue, Mdm Ho suggested that “a thank you sweetener of S$2m to S$4 million, say S$3 million” is simply a show “of earnest money that we will do our best to provide the best experience for both the artist and her team, and the concertgoers young and old.”
The PM’s wife also urged critics to chill. She wrote: “So chill, man, chill! Let TS and the various artists decide for themselves where they think it makes sense for them.”
Stepping into the fray of the controversy may have been unwise for the PM’s wife. Singaporeans themselves have picked apart her arguments, with many questioning why she is commenting on this issue in the first place.
Some on Reddit took issue with the way Mdm Ho characterised the monetary incentive, opining that she is doing government agencies no favours by making it seem like the grant was a gesture of gratitude.
A number of Singaporeans online pointed out that her depiction of the incentive as an honorarium or deal sweetener comes dangerously close to appearing like a bribe.
Others questioned the basis for Mdm Ho’s arguments, asking whether her source is “pillow talk with her husband”.
Calling her explanation “baffling,” u/ImpressiveStrike4196 asked: “Whats her source for this? Pillow talks with her husband? She’s not part of the civil service and is she involved in the decision making process?”
Asserting that her post “undermines” the Singapore Tourism Board’s (STB) case, u/shimmynywimminy said: “if the exclusivity condition was acceptable in the first place and the money didn’t swing things one way or another, what’s the point of paying it?
“I’m all for STB paying for an exclusivity deal if it is neccessary to secure a bigger return. but I am against a “thank you honorarium” with no discernable purpose. it’s a slippery slope to “free concert tickets for the minister to celebrate closing the deal”. if anything her post undermines STB’s case and makes it look like they are spending public money unnecessarily.”
A number of commenters online urged the PM’s wife to keep her opinions to herself and move on, while some poked holes in the figures she cited to support her view.
u/CommieBird said, “I don’t think the ticket prices cited by Ho Ching (via NYPost) were the retail prices. The numbers she cited were the marked up resale prices sold by scalpers.”
Some added that they do not see why Mdm Ho had to “insert herself” into this issue when the controversy was already dying down. u/Shoki81 suggested, “Some pple just want to add something to the conversation even when they have nothing to add”